My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/4/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/4/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:39:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/04/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lengthy discussion ensued about fees, and the extreme <br />tight budget under which the Board was working. <br />Mr.Thomas indicated that it may be necessary to use <br />Contingency Funds at the time of payment of the engineering services. <br />Attorney Collins commented that the County does not have <br />any authority to use the money until it was totally funded. He <br />explained that if people would show interest and pay their impact <br />fees, the sooner it was funded, the sooner they would go into the <br />next phase of the project. <br />John Robbins indicated that they have not statted the <br />design as yet. They have surveying teams that must be pulled <br />together, and also some aerial photographs must be made. He advised <br />that their firm would not be invoicing the County for about 60 days <br />because it would take them that long before they could generate an <br />invoice. <br />Administrator Nelson advised that the money they receive <br />for the impact fees would be in an escrow fund, and at the <br />appropriate time, the engineering fees would be paid from that escrow <br />fund. <br />Commissioner Scurlock added to his original Motion that <br />the engineering fees would be paid from the escrow fund. <br />Commissioner Bird seconded the Motion. <br />Lengthy discussion ensued. <br />The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and <br />carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner Fletcher voting in <br />opposition. <br />WATER. RESOURCES STUDY <br />The Board reviewed the following information regarding <br />the hater Resources Study! <br />BOOK 48 PAGE 29 <br />NOV 4 1981 29 (no page 30) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.