My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/18/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/18/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/18/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N 0 V 181981 <br />x 48 e <br />1 <br />FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT - PROPOSED AGREEMENT RE STREET LIGHTS <br />The Board then reviewed the following material: <br />October 29, 1981 <br />Mr. Neil Nelson <br />Indian River County Administrator <br />2345 14th Avenue <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />Dear Mr. Nelson: <br />BOX 460. FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 3;454 <br />FLORI-_-4 PO'i.:4i <br />& UGHT COV,:. :%Y <br />Y <br />J <br />Mr. Neil Nelson <br />Indian River County Administrator <br />2345 14th Avenue <br />Vero Beach, FL 32960 <br />Dear Mr. Nelson: <br />BOX 460. FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 3;454 <br />During phone conversations with Messrs. Hamilton and Davis, we understood <br />that the Commission has requested separate street lighting agreements <br />for Lighting Districts, specifically Laurelwood Subdivision. <br />The intent of these agreements is to form a contract binding FPL to a <br />governmental body such as a city or county. We are not permitted to <br />form these contracts with sub -groups or individuals on the same basis as <br />with a city or county because of differing financial requirements. Other <br />than with a governmental body, we are required to collect the entire cost <br />of material and construction up front and then refund the payment over a <br />ten-year period. As you can see, counties and cities have special <br />privileges for free installation of fighting facilities that should not <br />be disrupted in Indian River County. <br />Would you please ask the Commission to reconsider their request? I can <br />meet with you to discuss the problem, if you wish. We're not quite sure <br />why the Commission requested the change, but we certainly _�.ould like to <br />satisfy their requirements, if possible. <br />HRR: slt <br />EW4 <br />Sincerely yours, <br />d , <br />H. R. Reiner <br />FLORI-_-4 PO'i.:4i <br />& UGHT COV,:. :%Y <br />During phone conversations with Messrs. Hamilton and Davis, we understood <br />that the Commission has requested separate street lighting agreements <br />for Lighting Districts, specifically Laurelwood Subdivision. <br />The intent of these agreements is to form a contract binding FPL to a <br />governmental body such as a city or county. We are not permitted to <br />form these contracts with sub -groups or individuals on the same basis as <br />with a city or county because of differing financial requirements. Other <br />than with a governmental body, we are required to collect the entire cost <br />of material and construction up front and then refund the payment over a <br />ten-year period. As you can see, counties and cities have special <br />privileges for free installation of fighting facilities that should not <br />be disrupted in Indian River County. <br />Would you please ask the Commission to reconsider their request? I can <br />meet with you to discuss the problem, if you wish. We're not quite sure <br />why the Commission requested the change, but we certainly _�.ould like to <br />satisfy their requirements, if possible. <br />HRR: slt <br />EW4 <br />Sincerely yours, <br />d , <br />H. R. Reiner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.