My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/18/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/18/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/18/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N O V 181981 <br />TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: November 6, 1981 <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />am 48 enr-147 <br />FILE: <br />SUBJECT: Agreement proposed by Florida Power <br />and Light to Convert Existing Mercury <br />Vapor Street Lights to Energy Efficient <br />High Pressure Sodium <br />FROM: Neil A. Nelson, REFERENCES: 1) H.R. Reiner to Neil Nelson, <br />County Administrator County Administrator dated Oct.29,198 <br />2) Neil Nelson to Board of County <br />gate d—.ept . 1, 1981 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />During the September 30, 1981 meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, <br />the above subject agreement was discussed. At that time, the following questions <br />were presented: <br />1) Commissioner Fletcher had questions about the cost and efficiency of <br />the new lights. <br />2) Attorney Collins questioned the applicability of the agreement to <br />cover the Laureli•,-ood and Rockridge Street Lighting District. <br />ALTEP ATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />In discussing these items with Dir. H.R. Reiner of FPL, he states that the <br />intent of the agreement is to form one contract with the County binding FPL to a <br />governmental body such as a County or City. Mr. Reiner claims that FPL is not <br />permitted to form these contracts with street lighting districts. At the advice <br />of the County Attorney and as agreed by Mr. Reiner of FPL, if the agreement is <br />executed between "Indian River County on behalf of itself and the effected <br />Municipal Service Street Light Districts" and FPL, this matter -can be resolved. <br />The Direct Cost savings. to the County and Laurelwood Street Lighting <br />District is: <br />North Countv <br />Savings <br />South County <br />Savings <br />Laurelwood <br />Savings <br />Total <br />Savings <br />_ $912.00 per year <br />.363.448 per year <br />266.40 Per year <br />$15.11.88 per year <br />One agreement will serve all areas as proposed. The Rockridge District <br />is serviced by the.City of Vero -Beach and does not apply. <br />Mr. Reiner also requests that-"F-Yhibit D" (Replacement Proposal) be <br />revised to delete the word "cut-off" beneath the Proposed Replacement (lumens - <br />type) column to allow the flexibility of using new products now on the market <br />that are superior to the "cut-off" lunimaire. <br />The alternatives considered are as follows: <br />Alternative # 1 <br />Approve the Chairman executing the agreement between "Indian River <br />County -on behalf of itself and the effected Municipal Service Street LiRt <br />Districts". The impact approvin, this alternative would have includes a� <br />savings of $1,215.48 per Near for the County and $266.40 per year for <br />the Laurelwood Street Lighting District. The Rockridge Street Lighting <br />District is serviced by the City of Fero Beach, not FPL. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.