11/30/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

N O V 3 01981 48 PACF 220 that Mr. Gierhart take a copy and revise it to fit Indian River Shores concept. The Board continued to discuss the need for revised figures and also the situation in regard to the County enclave, Le Mer and Sea Watch. Engineer Robbins informed the Board that the enclave shows up as Item 11, and its impact is figured as 1% of the flow to the lift station. He further noted that the formula for the enclave is set out explicitly in the tri -partite agreement, i.e., the enclave will have to use the Town facilities to receive sewer service and the Town will have the right to charge the enclave at a rate consistent with that charged other Town residents. Engineer Robbins then drew a sketch of the location of the pump stations and lift stations, noting that the pump stations, which are in deplorable condition and constitute a health risk, will be taken out of service. All of the LeMer sewage will flow to the north and will be in the Town of Indian River Shores; Sea Watch sewage will flow south to the County pumping station. The cost to connect Sea Watch is borne by the Town of Indian River shores even though the sewage will wind up in a lift station the county is paving for. Mr. Curtin noted that Indian River Shores does pay a proportionate share of pumping station #1, which takes care of the Sea Watch situation, and it was agreed this was covered and prorated. The Commission continued to review figures and possible costs, and it was felt that a Motion could not be made until staff can come up with a correct number of taps. Chairman Lyons pointed out that we have the statement of Mr. Gierhart that they are willing to accept our proposal based on cost of the contractor's bid, and he asked whether the Board could take some steps to move ahead now with this understanding. � � r _I