My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/2/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
12/2/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:45:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/02/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SOUTH COUNTY WELL NO. 3 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 <br />The Board discussed the following information: <br />TO: Honorable Members of Indian DATE: November 19, 1981 FILE: <br />River County Board of Commissioners <br />i1%� <br />FROM :r Neil <br />Construction of South County <br />Well No. 3, Change Order No. 2 <br />Letter Mosby to Nelson, <br />Nelson, County -Admin-" REFERENCES: dated 11/6/81 with encl os <br />by Geraghty and Miller <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Part of the plans and DER requirements is the completion of a <br />third production well for the South County Water Plant. It has always <br />been the intent to complete the third well after the two production <br />wells and one test well prove satisfactory and the water withdrawal <br />permit has been obtained. This procedure had previously been approved <br />by the Board of County Commissioners to assure that the wells would prove <br />satisfactory before investing in the third well. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The attached information from Sverdrup and Parcel has documentation <br />which shows the bid prices from Alsay-Pippin for installing the well and <br />Geraghty and Miller for the hydrogeology work. <br />This bid price is shown less expensive when compared with bids from <br />other well contractors. This competitive comparison was required by <br />FmHA before they would agree to cover the cost of the well construction <br />as a change order. The comparison is as follows: <br />Contractor Bid <br />Alsay Pippin $45,488.00 <br />McCullers & Howard $57,120.00 <br />Layne -Atlantic $53,692.00 <br />Meredith Corp. $63,990.00 <br />RECOMMENDATION AND FUNDING <br />It is recommended that Change Order =2 be approved for the well <br />construction by Alsay-Pippin for 545,488.00; that task of logging, <br />testing, and documentation of the ;cell and water samples as well as the <br />report be approved for Geraghty and Miller for $17,200.00 (as esti-ated <br />by them); that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners 'e <br />authorized to execute 5 copies of Change Order No. 2 for FmHt;. <br />It was confirmed through Tommy Tho -as, the engineering consul ant, <br />and the finance office that there is a balance of S82,504.99 olus interest <br />available of the $450,000 original loan to start the South County ;.,later <br />Plant project. This will more than adecuateiy cover the S45,488.00 + <br />$17,200 = $62,688.00 that this well will cost - and have some money <br />remaining. The available funds will therefore cover the cost of this <br />well as was planned. <br />35 <br />800K 48 PACE -258 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.