12/16/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r I DEC 1619 1 820K 48 PASJ42 RECOMI-IENDATIObi Staff has reviewed this request and recommends that the site plan extension be granted for an additional six months, provided that the applicant meets the criteria specified in the Paving Ordinance (Ordinance #81-36). Staff also recommends that no further extension be granted unless the c;iner can demonstrate that extreme cir- cumstances prevent starting of construction. Discussion followed, and it was noted that this is the first extension requested. Commissioner Wodtke asked if the Board can require the applicant to meet the new paving requirements, and Attorney Collins noted that the time period on the applicant's site plan already has expired, and he did not feel they are in any position to argue. Commissioner Scurlock wished to know why the staff is recommending extension, and Mr. Rever explained that the proposal is one that does not cause any adverse effect, and it is the same except for the new paving requirement. Commissioner Scurlock pointed out that this will require additional services and additional staff time, and he felt there should be some additional fee. Planning Director Rever reported that they now are looking into adjusting all their charges and are giving consideration to such a fee. Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, to deny the request for extension. Commissioner Bird noted that he probably would vote against the Motion because Mr. Gagliardi will have to come back in, and this will also be an additional burden on staff. He stated that he really did not have any problem with the request as long as the applicant agrees to bring his site plan up to current requirements. Chairman Lyons suggested that possibly the Board should vote this Motion down and table the matter until Mr. Gagliardi can be present. 26