My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
12/16/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:47:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
regard to using the remaining grant funds for the Gifford <br />area, but he was informed these funds were allocated on the <br />basis of population to be used specifically in the Gifford <br />area and could not be used by the County to purchase a <br />sewage plant for itself. They did say that if a program <br />could be conceived to install the plant in Gifford, the <br />money could be used for that purpose. <br />Discussion continued as to a source for the $37,000. <br />and Engineer Robbins noted that the County accrued around <br />$25,000 of investment income on= -the tax anticipation note <br />for the test well for the South County. In addition, there <br />is a report that there are some excess funds in the Gifford <br />system. Mr. Robbins then discussed impact fees in the <br />General Utility Fund, and Utility Director Liner reported <br />that all the monies from impact fees are in a special <br />account, and it is intended for capital expansion. <br />Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that if we took money <br />from the impact fee account and actually purchased this <br />sewer plant into that account, the account then would have <br />an asset of a used plant rather than cash, and eventually <br />whatever.enterprise system we put the plant into would have <br />to repay the account. It was generally agreed that would be <br />the way to go. <br />Chairman Lyons asked how we get the $37,000 right now, <br />and Engineer Robbins stated they have money in the escrow <br />account. <br />On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board, by a 4 to 1 vote, Commissioner <br />Fletcher voting in opposition, approved the recommendation <br />of staff to establish an impact fee of $747.35, with the <br />County's total contribution being $37,175.90, and to utilize <br />the impact fee account for this purpose as discussed. <br />Administrator Nelson commented that some residents of <br />Pebble Bay are upset because they feel they are paying twice. <br />DEC 161981 82 8 PAGF3991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.