Laserfiche WebLink
� � r <br />The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the value of these resources and <br />adopts an attitude of conservation, but we fear it falls short of implementing <br />that committment. The Plan is essentially dependent on regional,State, <br />and Federal agencies for resource inventory, land acquisition, and <br />regulatory functions. We believe it is the County's responsibility to <br />take this lead role in protecting our environment. <br />(An essential first step is for Indian River County to employ a' <br />professional environmental planner who is trained in the ecology and <br />management of natural systems. It would be fruitless to assign the task <br />of resource management to the Planning Department, without also providing <br />the technical expertise to design, evaluate, and implement such a program <br />The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council; Florida Departments of <br />Agriculture, Environmental Regulation, and.Natural Resources; Florida <br />Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; <br />and U.S. Soil Conservation Service can be relied on to provide input to <br />resource inventory and management, but none of these agencies have the <br />capability to supervise a program specifically for Indian River County. <br />That is the responsibility of our local government. <br />- d <br />• The list of needed studies.and regulations presented in the Comprehensive <br />Plan is a good start. We wish to suggest additional topics, however, <br />which should be considered. <br />1. Indian River County possesses coastal strand, tropical coastal <br />hammocks, sand pine scrub, and other unique upland habitats <br />which are not protected by regional, State, or Federal statutes. <br />In addition to their educational and aesthetic values, these <br />habitats are extremely important for stabilization of unconsolidated <br />sediments and recharge of the shallow aquifer along the sand <br />ridge. Because development pressure is greatest in upland <br />areas, the County would be wise to acquire, or limit ditstruction <br />of these unique habitats now, while they are relatively plentiful, <br />rather than to wait until they are nearly depleted and prohibitively <br />expensive. <br />2. Restrictions on fill placement, drainage, and vegetative <br />destruction within wetlands are vital to effective management <br />of these resources. These development actions are partially <br />regulated by State or Federal agencies, but local government <br />must not depend on these "big brothers" to do the job for us. <br />An excellent example of effective environmental control over <br />wetland resources, albeit 30 years late, is Dade County's <br />Department of Environmental Resources Management. <br />3. We must reduce unit densities and development within the 100 <br />year floodplain, particularly along the Sebastian and Indian <br />Rivers. Encouraging development in the floodplain not only <br />increases the public costs of stormwater drainage, transportation, <br />and civil emergency planning, but courts natural disaster) - <br />Accordingly, the County should re-evaluate its position of <br />support for the Federal Flood Insurance Program. This program, <br />originally intended to discourage Federal participation in or <br />support of floodplain development, has been perverted into an <br />incredibly expensive bureaucracy which encourages and financially <br />subsidizes wetland and floodplain development. <br />JAN 61982 88 48 r4�.506 <br />