My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/17/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
2/17/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2023 11:06:12 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:58:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/17/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pr - <br />FEB 171982 <br />BOOK 48 .88, WE88, <br />AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 80-13, UTILITIES ORDINANCE <br />The Board reviewed the following memorandums regarding <br />the amendments to Ordinance 80-13: <br />TO: Gary Brandenburg, <br />County Attorney <br />FROM: George Liner, <br />Utilities Director <br />DATE: '.January 13, 1982 FILE: <br />SUBJECT: Amendments to Ordinance 80-13 <br />REFERENCES: <br />The attached proposed amendments are suggested for Ordinance 30-13. To <br />do this we should delete Section 6 and Section 12 and replace those with the <br />attached. <br />These amendments accomplish several things that had been contemplated or <br />were previously in the works. <br />A. Multi -family condo units (ala Vista Royale) will be billed on a rating system <br />that had been approved by the Board of Commissioners, this change to occur <br />after the new water plant provides the service, (approximately November 1982). <br />Before then we shall bill each condo building as calculated by the computer as <br />though it has one unit (with 2000 gallons allowed for the first $7.10). <br />B. There is provision for assessment to developers who reserve plant capacity <br />but dp not build. This is necessary to recover bond funds and preclude <br />developers tying up the plants reserve for an indefinite time. <br />C. Provision is made for a higher security deposit for leased properties. <br />There are usually large turnovers with many customers leaving unpaid bilis. <br />With these larger deposits, the County will be better protected and avoid <br />these problems in the future. <br />D. A correction to this Section 12 had been reviewed with Commissioners, <br />Planning, Engineerina and Board of Health. We believe this version clarifies <br />the section to avoid future misunderstandings for properties with wells and <br />septic tanks on the same property. <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.