Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Wodtke stated that we authorized the <br />removal of the carpet in the Courtroom, the Judge's office, <br />and the secretary's office in that north wing and for them <br />to come back with a proposal of how to refinish it or how to <br />leave it. <br />Discussion followed on the fact that the Judge wants <br />immediate action - the quarters are vacated, but the carpet <br />has not been removed as yet. Commissioner Wodtke discussed <br />a possible Motion authorizing removal of the carpet in the <br />offices in the north wing and installation of vinyl. He <br />expressed great concern about the possibility of -the Judge <br />having an adverse reaction to any adhesive that might be <br />used, and felt, since we already have spent $35,000 trying <br />to clear up this problem, that it is very important to have <br />approval of the adhesive. <br />Further discussion ensued about certification of the <br />glue, and Chairman Scurlock felt that the only certification <br />is when the Judge can go back there and feel comfortable and <br />safe, and the Judge must be the ultimate certifier. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, to authorize removal of the carpet in <br />the office sections of the Judge's north wing area and <br />installation of a sheet vinyl approved by the Judge, the <br />adhesive also to be approved by the Judge and the money to <br />be taken from the Building Fund. <br />Chairman Scurlock reiterated that the Judge's <br />preference was to do nothing but the Courtroom at first. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that the Judge apparently <br />agrees to vinyl in the other rooms, and if he comes back in <br />there and doesn't have problems, then we don't have to <br />remove the carpet in the courtroom. <br />It was pointed out that the Judge would have to enter <br />and exit through the Courtroom or the other areas of the <br />Courthouse, all of which are carpeted. <br />MAR 31982 <br />BOOS 9 FAA 9 <br />