Laserfiche WebLink
1. Northward from Round Island to approximately the <br />southern boundary of the Moorings. Much of this area <br />would not meet the criteria to be considered developed. <br />2. Brevard County's Coastal Barrier, which is immediately <br />adjacent to the North, is not proposed as an Undeveloped <br />Coastal Barrier. Development in the southern -portions <br />of Brevard County is minimal and may not meet the <br />criteria to be considered developed. <br />The County should encourage the Department of the Interior to <br />further study these areas and ammend the proposals as appropriate. <br />Additionally, several errors were made in the information summary <br />developed by the Department of the Interior. These include: <br />1. Section 7 reads 4,060 total acres and staff's 'calcu- <br />lations <br />calcu- <br />1 ti ns indicate 4,167 total acres. <br />2. Section 8 reads 3.1 Beach length (miles) and staff's <br />calculations indicate approximately 8.75 miles. <br />3. Section 9 indicated no publicly owned land exists, <br />however, Ambersand Beach Park is 3.2 acres and owned <br />by the County. <br />4. Section 12 indicates Jungle Trail as a paved road. <br />RECO'. DIENDATION : <br />The staff recommends that the information presented herein, and <br />public comments be forwarded to the Interior Department for <br />consideration. <br />Mr. Challacombe advised the Board that he recently <br />attended the workshop presented by the Department of <br />Interior concerning the undeveloped Barrier Island and the <br />Federal Flood Insurance. With the criteria and definitions <br />imposed on the County the Department of Interior, the burden <br />of proof was on the County to show that the barrier island <br />was developed. He pointed out that the maps used to <br />determine the undeveloped coastal barriers are outdated and <br />there are many other inconsistencies that were used as <br />criteria. Mr. Challacombe then mentioned various attorneys <br />who have raised objections to this matter, on behalf of <br />their clients, as well as objections from the Town of Orchid <br />and from the Vero Beach Board of Realtors. He added that <br />the Department of Interior did not consider the <br />MAR 101982 5 BOOK 49 PAE 106 <br />