4/7/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The Board continued to discuss the transition period; how it would apply to site plan approval on any of the lots in question; and whether they would have to obtain site plan approval within that time in order to be valid. It was Attorney Brandenburg's interpretation that they would, and that in the case of duplexes, they would be asking for approval of a site plan contrary to the CLUP. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher to reject the request for an extension of the 60 day transition period. Commissioner Bird noted, for the record to be accurate, that he did believe after looking at the map that. Mr. DeJoia's property was in the medium density area. Mr. Challacombe informed the Board that this map is questionable in concerns of scale. Estes Street is not shown, and if you take a line drawn from the municipal airport, the DeJoia property would be in low density; however if Elaine St. is scaled properly, it would be in medium. On the new map 80th Avenue is the line between LD -1 and MD -1. In further discussion on the transition period, Commissioner Bird noted that the 60 day extension then actually would not do Mr. DeJoia any good because he would have to sell all the lots within this period and they would have to come in and get final approval; this would not create a problem for single family which does not require site plan approval, but it would for structures such as a duplex. Chairman Scurlock called for the question on the Motion to deny the 60 day extension. It was voted on and carried 3 to 2 with Commissioners Bird and Wodtke voting in opposi- tion. Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by Commissioner Fletcher, to approve the staff recommendation 45 APR 7 1982+ ��