Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Bird noted that the Board never has seen the <br />site plan in question, and wished it confirmed that if the Board <br />should take the position that the applicant does have a vested <br />right, the site plan then would be further processed and either <br />approved or disapproved based on site plan criteria. <br />Attorney Brandenburg agreed that what this would accomplish <br />would be to put the site plan back in the normal process. <br />Planner Ragsdale stated that he did believe the applicant <br />and Mr. Quinn have acted in good faith and they have been very <br />cooperative. <br />none. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone wished to be heard. There were <br />On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lyons,.the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird felt it was' -.a mistake when this property -- <br />was zoned C-1 originally; however, it was done. He continued <br />that although it was shown as residential in the 1975 Plan, <br />rezoning was never initiated to take it out of commercial, and he <br />did believe the applicant has a vested right. <br />On Motion by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lyons, the Board unanimously agreed that the Wilmoths do have a <br />vested right and that their application should continue in the <br />normal site plan review process. <br />EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - KINGSLAKE SUBDIVISION <br />The Board reviewed the staff recommendation, as follows: <br />APR 211982 <br />65 POGO 49 4651 <br />