My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
5/19/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
multi -family development are much more stringent than those <br />involved in the building of single family residences. <br />Commissioner Fletcher then questioned the difference in <br />the units depicted in the different areas, and Mr. Maureau <br />r. <br />explained that the larger building possibly could be a <br />2 -story building with 8 units on each floor. The smaller <br />building would be an 8-plex. These are just conceptual <br />plans. <br />In further discussion, it was noted that this actually <br />all comes under site plan approval, and all we are <br />considering today is whether or not to allow the requested <br />rezoning. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be <br />heard. <br />Frank Wilmoth of 2776 .6th Place informed the Board that <br />he is associated with Plantation Ridge Subdivision, a <br />proposed multi -family development located 500' from the <br />development now being considered, which the Commission <br />unanimously denied a requested rezoning to R -2D just a few <br />weeks ago. Mr. Wilmoth noted that one of the reasons given <br />for the denial was because this supposedly was a water <br />sensitive area, another reason was the traffic situation, <br />and also because over 200 residents of the area signed a <br />petition opposing rezoning for multi -family development. He <br />further emphasized that his proposed development, which was <br />so strongly'opposed by area residents, was only half the <br />size of that now proposed by General Development. <br />Commissioner Wodtke agreed Mr. Wilmoth's proposed <br />development was in the same general area, but believed there <br />is a considerable difference between its location on top and <br />west of the ridge and the location proposed by General <br />Development, especially in regard to drainage problems. In <br />addition, General Development will have public sewer and <br />water facilities. <br />MAY 1 9�9$� <br />115 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.