Laserfiche WebLink
Box Q pw 8� <br />JUN 16 9982 <br />& Zoning process, which process would include input from the <br />City of Sebastian. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously <br />authorized the County Attorney to work with <br />the attorney for the City of Sebastian on a <br />Stipulation re the Duck Point property as <br />discussed above. <br />TREASURE COAST UTILITIES CONSENT ORDER <br />Attorney Brandenburg informed the Board that he now can <br />recommend approval of a revised Consent Order re Treasure <br />Coast Utilities as explained in the following memo: <br />TO: Gary Brandenburg, <br />County Attorney <br />FROM: TEeorer� <br />9 <br />Utilities Manager <br />DATE: June 4, 1982 FILE: <br />SUBJECT' Discussion with regard to <br />Treasure Coast Consent Order <br />REFERENCES: <br />I met with Len Kozlov and Bill Bostwick, both of Florida DER, to discuss our <br />differences in the consent order wording and requirements. <br />I agreed that we will contract to install a small well and arrange for power <br />to be brought to the sewage plant. We will clean out the chlorinator shed and chlorine <br />contact tank and the pipe feed to it. If we must water proof it and install baffles, <br />we will do it. <br />I could not guarantee the effluent detention time nor the chlorine residual after <br />application. However, they and I agreed that we will apply chlorine at 100 pounds <br />per day or obtain a 0.5 mg/l residual at the end of the chlorine contact tank. <br />I mentioned that there is no way to implement this chlorination in 5 days. I <br />told them 20 to 25 days would be nearly a practical time allowance. I was told that <br />we would not be held to the five day requirement because of our agreement to satisfy <br />the intent of the consent order. <br />I am taking DER at their word in that this will be satisfactory to them. We <br />should delete any phrase which implies the plant is performing any effective treatment; <br />since we are chlorinating only to avoid possibi� spread of disease. <br />/9 <br />" <br />• `dV"D i <br />ty AttuineY <br />� j, <br />Ai/ <br />I met with Len Kozlov and Bill Bostwick, both of Florida DER, to discuss our <br />differences in the consent order wording and requirements. <br />I agreed that we will contract to install a small well and arrange for power <br />to be brought to the sewage plant. We will clean out the chlorinator shed and chlorine <br />contact tank and the pipe feed to it. If we must water proof it and install baffles, <br />we will do it. <br />I could not guarantee the effluent detention time nor the chlorine residual after <br />application. However, they and I agreed that we will apply chlorine at 100 pounds <br />per day or obtain a 0.5 mg/l residual at the end of the chlorine contact tank. <br />I mentioned that there is no way to implement this chlorination in 5 days. I <br />told them 20 to 25 days would be nearly a practical time allowance. I was told that <br />we would not be held to the five day requirement because of our agreement to satisfy <br />the intent of the consent order. <br />I am taking DER at their word in that this will be satisfactory to them. We <br />should delete any phrase which implies the plant is performing any effective treatment; <br />since we are chlorinating only to avoid possibi� spread of disease. <br />