My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/14/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
7/14/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:11:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/14/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: The Honorable Members of the <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />THRU:Dr. C.B. Hardin, Jr., PhD <br />Acting County Administrator <br />DATE: June 25, 1982 FILE: <br />SUBJ ECT:FDOT Intersection Improvement <br />17th Street/US 1 <br />FROM: James W. Davis,P.E. Oel, REFERENCES: <br />Public Works Director <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />Briefly, the history of proposed improvements to the west leg of the subject <br />intersection began in 1980 with FDOT designing the project and unsuccessfully <br />bidding for construction in February and June of 1981 due to excessive cost. <br />The project was then locally simulated by incorporation within the Sixteenth <br />Street Traffic Improvement Plan (February 1982). FDOT was requested to re -bid <br />the project in January 1982. Their response (see attached letter dated January <br />25, 1982) indicated a desire to modify the project to lessen cost and that the <br />City of Vero Beach and County investigate closing the project's roadway segment <br />to through traffic as a way to reduce cost. <br />Public meeting was held on June 9, 1982 to discuss the proposed roadway closure <br />with local property owners and merchants. Results of the meeting (see attached <br />memorandum from Clifford J. Suthard, dated June 24, 1982) clearly indicated that <br />closing the roadway to through traffic would be unacceptable to local property <br />owners and merchants. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />It is necessary to proceed with a determination of the County's position regarding <br />the timing, phasing, funding, and traffic maintenance of the subject project _ <br />and to inform FDOT of the County's position to let FDOT proceed with or deactivate <br />the project. <br />Alternative # 1 Obtain maximum funding from FDOT <br />This will involve the following: <br />1. Closing 17th Street to through traffic; <br />2. Constructing the project at FDOT's convenience, which may <br />or may not occur simultaneously with the County's 16th Street <br />construction. <br />Advantages and disadvantages: <br />A. Cost to the County would be minimized; <br />B. The local merchants and property owners will object closing <br />- 17th Street to.through traffic; <br />C. Coordination with the 16th Street project will not be ensured. <br />Alternative # 2 Give local merchants and property owners ultimate consideration <br />This will involve the following activities: <br />1. Maintaining through traffic on 17th Street; <br />2. Coordinate the project with the 16th Street project at the <br />County's convenience, start date approximately May 1, 1983; <br />3. Assume all or some costs (maximum $200,000.00) of the project <br />resulting from delay and/or excessive budget. <br />32 <br />L- JUL 14 1982 <br />BOOK 50 PA.0 472 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.