Laserfiche WebLink
J U L 2 71982 <br />in the definition of a commercial node - only actual <br />commercial uses. <br />FRANK WILSON <br />Planning Manager Challacombe reported that Mr. Wilson, <br />who owns 1.7 right behind the Hearndon property, has written <br />a letter asking that he be informed just what use he can <br />make of his property. This property is zoned commercial <br />presently and is designated on the Land Use Plan as RR -1. <br />Mr. Challacombe stated that if Mr. Wilson comes in with a <br />site plan, it will be forwarded to site plan review and then <br />to the County Commission. <br />A lady in the audience reported that Mr. Wilson wants <br />to sell the property, but he can't sell it if he doesn't <br />know whether or not it is commercial. <br />Community Development Director King believed Mr. <br />Wilson's question mainly related to whether a residential <br />structure would be permitted on his property since it does <br />not meet the acreage requirements of RR -1. He felt Mr. <br />Wilson would be able to put at least one structure on that <br />property and stated that he will write Mr. Wilson a letter <br />to that effect and have the Attorney review it. <br />ITEM #6 - COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION IN THE SR 60 AND 43RD <br />AVENUE AREA <br />Peter Beuttell came before the Board in regard to the <br />following letter, and noted that although the property in <br />question is presently zoned C-1 commercial and this <br />historically has been a commercial area, the new node does <br />not include this property. <br />27 <br />