Laserfiche WebLink
tc 0 rMvt. <br />AUG 41982 <br />T. <br />addressed at the next public hearing or whether it is <br />something which can be addressed through zoning. <br />Attorney Brandenburg stated that this can be handled <br />strictly in the Zoning Code. It could be included in the <br />Comprehensive Land Use -Plan if desired, but it is not <br />required. <br />It was noted we have numerous private airstrips around <br />the county, and the Attorney stated that the Statute applies <br />only to public airports. <br />Community Development Director Bruce King noted that <br />the Land Use Plan as currently laid out shows an MD -1 area <br />west of I-95 which will overlay this entire airport area. <br />Discussion ensued about a pending rezoning request and <br />the possible desirability of amending the Land Use Plan to <br />reflect a more appropriate land use pattern around the <br />airport at our next public- hearing if we are contemplating <br />making a conceptual change affecting a substantial area. <br />W. E. "Kinky" Orth noted that this question encompasses <br />many things, even power lines, and he believed both the DOT <br />and FAA would help the Planning Board with any questions <br />they might have. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt it would help when the <br />ordinance is brought back, if drawings could be presented so <br />the Board could see how the property around Hibiscus <br />Airport, for instance, would be affected. <br />Mr. Orth noted that they classify airports differently, <br />but all public airports are licensed and inspected. <br />Attorney Cooksey stated that all this information is <br />available, and he will be glad to work with Planning on it. <br />THE.CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />M �88 <br />