My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/1/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
9/1/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:26:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/01/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner <br />1982- <br />2 <br />Commissioner Bird briefly reviewed events of the last <br />few months concerning the intended use of the park parcels <br />at Orchid Island. He had asked the Attorney to do research <br />and make a determination if the park parcels were dedicated <br />to the County or to the residents of the area. After <br />discussions and correspondence with Attorneys VanDeVoorde <br />and Henderson, this item was withdrawn from the last <br />meeting, but now it was back for the Board to make a <br />determination. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, that the Board adopt <br />Resolution 82-86 formally accepting park <br />parcels on Orchid Island. <br />Roger Cooper, resident of Orchid Island, approached the <br />Board, and noted that the developer in the area_ had planned <br />for the park parcels to belong to the potential property <br />owners. He asked if the property owners or the County had <br />control of the lots. <br />Dr. Charles Holt, Orchid Island, came before the Board <br />and briefly discussed the confusion concerning the property, <br />and the property owners wanted to have clarification that it <br />was County -owned property. <br />Attorney Brandenburg noted that on the plats, the park <br />parcels were clearly dedicated to the public but that would <br />not preclude the Board from using, the parcel as a <br />neighborhood park. He suggested the resolution be utilized <br />because the dedication of the park was an offer, and unless <br />an act accepting it occurred, the offer would be <br />outstanding. Attorney Brandenburg added that because of <br />that, and the doubt it had created, he suggested the <br />resolution be adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.