My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-28
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
1990'S
>
1991
>
1991-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2019 1:23:30 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 9:22:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
1991-28
Adopted Date
06/18/1991
Ordinance Type
Land Use Element Amendment
State Filed Date
06\18\1991
Entity Name
St. Sebastian River C-2 District
Subject
C-3 Conservation District
Codified or Exempt
Codified
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
12206
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SmeadSoft Reprint Date: Friday, August 23, 2013 - 1 <br />Application of a conservation designation to St. Sebastian River <br />wetlands and adjacent scrub communities would have the benefit of <br />promoting land development compatible with resource protection. <br />Within the St. Sebastian River conservation area, a development <br />densittrof t unit—per4fl—acres forwetiands would- effectively <br />protect such resources which are inherently not conducive for land <br />development. A 1 unit per acre transfer of -deVeIGPMeA".—Si�]'! <br />credit for wetlands would .provide further wetland protection <br />incentive. <br />Unlike wetlands, scrub uplands have physical characteristics prime <br />for land development. Since xeric scrub areas are "high and dry', <br />the conflict of development vs. preservation is greater than with <br />wetlands. For these reasons, a development density of 1 unit per <br />22 acres on the scrub uplands adjacent to the river would provide <br />adequate protection in combination with a pro ec xve utter along <br />the river and a cluster development requirement. While a 1 unit <br />per 40 acres density application to the scrub upland (as well as <br />wetlands) would provide substantial development deterrence, a 1 <br />unit per 21 acre density strikes a. more reasonable balance between_ <br />private development rights and upland scrub protection. Moreover, <br />a 1 unit per 2' acre—density—aubjEct—to—an—upland conse-r-vation <br />percent set aside requirement would promote conservation <br />The intent of a St. Sebastian River conservation area is to provide <br />development control as it pertains to the St. Sebastian River, <br />associated wetlands, and adjacent xeric scrub communities. While <br />the conservation designation can be generally depicted on an <br />overall county land use map, specific boundaries of the <br />conservation area need to be establishedon a site- y -s a review <br />basis, reflecting the extent of such natural communities. The <br />specific extent of xeric scrub communities can be <br />field verification of existing scrub soils and/or vegetation, using <br />the Indian River County Soil and GFC,xeric scrub communities report <br />and survey for reference. <br />For establishing the general eastern boundary of the St. Sebastian River <br />conservation area, Roseland-Roadi a sonable cut-off point. Approximately 500- <br />600 acres of land exist between the river and Roseland Road in the area of concern. <br />Of this aermee, approximately 300 acre- are classified byAhe GFC as xeric scrub' <br />using National Wetland. Inventory (NWI) maps, aerial photographs and the county soil <br />survey as an information base it is estimated that roughly 125 acres of the remaining <br />200-300 acres between the river and Roseland Road are wetlands. <br />Thus, it is estimated that approximately 75-175 acres between the St. Sebastian <br />River and Roseland Road are non -xeric scrub uplands, the specific location of which <br />could-bedetermine'—�ite-by-site review -basis (as previously mentioned). <br />land development density of 1 unit per acre on this acreage would be appropriate, <br />in that it would be consisen —with <br />the 75-175 number of residential units that could potentially be built on this property <br />at a 1 unit per acre density is consistent with overall projected population in the <br />Urban Service Area of the county, in that the density allowance would not create an <br />unreasonable "supply" of potential homesites beyond the projected population's need <br />(see the Land Use and Housing Elements for reference information on population and <br />housing needs projections) <br />-68.1- <br />2:00:07 - OfncialDocuments:626, Attachment Id 0, Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.