Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 291992 <br />Chairman Scurlock reviewed the Letters of Conditions <br />r• <br />from 1977 to 1980. The Board did not adopt the rate <br />structure of $8.00/2.00 that was, in Engineer Robbins' <br />analysis when they adopted Ordinance 80-13; therefore, the <br />confusion arose. He continued that the auditing firm did <br />not point out to the Board that their bond requirements were <br />not being met. The Chairman then quoted minutes of previous <br />meetings where the rate structure had been discussed. <br />Mr. Robbins commented that at the time the Board <br />adopted Ordinance 80-13 using the rate structure of <br />$7.10/1.50, they contacted FmHA in order to find out how <br />they felt. FmHA's response was that the County could charge <br />the rate indicated in Ordinance 80-13 but just before <br />closing on the loan, they would have to be in compliance <br />with the Letter of Conditions. <br />Lengthy discussion followed, and it was emphasized-=, <br />that from the very beginning, the Board entered into an <br />agreement with Vista Properties to convey their system to <br />the County. <br />William J. Lehr, Jr., Vista Royale Association <br />President, came before the Board and requested the following <br />be made a part of the minutes: <br />