My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/6/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
10/6/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:33:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/06/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Judge referred to a conversation he had with Chief <br />Judge Trowbridge where they discussed a letter from Chief <br />Justice James Alterman of the Supreme Court. The letter <br />indicated the County was eligible for another judge as the <br />population had doubled in ten years. When asked if he <br />could use the assistance of another County Judge, Judge <br />Stikelether responded that he "would leave that up to your <br />wisdom." That was where the matter stood, he advised. <br />Commissioner Lyons thought the Board would like to have <br />Judge Stikelether's advice on this matter. <br />Judge Stikelether responded that he would appreciate <br />it if he were permitted healthy surroundings that would allow <br />him to function normally, without being pushed into areas <br />in which he functioned abnormally, where he would not function <br />at all, incidentally, because he would step down before then. <br />The Judge felt he could handle his case load, because he was <br />a workaholic. <br />Commissioner Lyons affirmed that he knew the Judge was <br />a hard worker. <br />Judge S.tikdlether stated that by the same token, according <br />to the figures of the case load and population,. many counties <br />with much less impressive figures have more than one County <br />Judge, and he would not object. The Judge added that the <br />only thing the County must take into consideration was that, <br />of course, there was one courtroom area still open in the <br />courthouse. If the situation were to come to a point that <br />they could return to the courthouse, then a second County <br />Judge and his judicial assistant would necessitate office <br />space, along with an additional courtroom, which he under- <br />stood was in the planning stage. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that he understood that, and <br />that the Board would want to go about the job of trying to take <br />care of the matter. <br />OCT 6 1982 31 �o z. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.