My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/20/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
10/20/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:34:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
going to be constructed in this area, and they do not want <br />to pull the signal out until that is constructed. The <br />recommendation now is to improve 43rd Avenue by adding a <br />left turn lane both north and south bound, and they would <br />like to put 42nd Avenue on a holding pattern until after the <br />new construction. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Fletcher, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the <br />Board by a 3 to 0 vote, Commissioner <br />Lyons having left the meeting and <br />Commissioner Bird being absent, agreed <br />to accept the recommendation of the <br />,Public Works Director as above. <br />POST OFFICE REQUESTS CENTRALIZED MAIL DELIVERY BOXES <br />Community Development Director Bruce King went over the <br />memo presented at the October 6th meeting which reported <br />that the Postal Service is discontinuing door-to-door <br />delivery and deliveries will be made only to individual <br />mailboxes located along the street, cluster mailboxes, or <br />horizontal mailboxes. Mr. King noted that we have two <br />situations - one where the installation is going to occur in <br />an existing residential area, and second, where the mail box <br />facility is going to be part of the normal new construction <br />process. Staff recommends that new construction follow the <br />same review process and pay all applicable fees. In exis- <br />ting residential areas, it is recommended that all the fees <br />would be waived if the installation does not have a shelter. <br />If a shelter is involved, then they would be required to get <br />a building permit and inspection and pay the applicable fee. <br />He noted -that he has not reviewed this with the Post Office <br />Department, but had thought they would have a representative <br />at the meetim�g; he did .con st -t1m;ity of Vam Bearh. <br />OCT 20 1982 QEF 70� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.