11/17/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MD -1 area as being contingent on the size and shape of the node, and argument continued regarding expansion of the node as several members of the Board were not convinced that it had not been expanded and also in regard to it not being a definitive node with specific boundaries. Commissioner Fletcher felt the discussion was wandering from the relevant issue, which is the specific request for rezoning. In regard to dealing with the identification of issues and non -issues, he was not convinced that the proximity of the airport to the proposed mobile home subdivision is not an issue, and he believed that when the subject acreage fills up with a bunch of folks, every time a loaded spray plane takes off, there will be complaints - raised. Commissioner Fletcher believed it was his responsibility as a Commissioner to prevent these problems. Chairman Scurlock brought up the problem of how such a development would affect the flight pattern, and noted that restricting the turn -out to the west, would put it over the single family residences in the area. Commissioner Bird commented that if this 135 acres were to be developed into an industrial park, he felt it would generate not only more traffic, but heavier truck type traffic than a retirement community. He further noted that there did not appear to be anything in the staff's fiscal comparables relating to revenue derived by the County from Sales Tax collected when the mobile home unites were sold. Mr. King agreed that was an oversight, but noted this _ is the first fiscal impact analysis done by staff. He continued that generally any other use than residential would have a better impact. He further explained that the $9,000 positive impact figures from industrial was a direct impact figure; they did not estimate secondary impacts. 56 N O V 171992