Laserfiche WebLink
Mrs. Klauka wished further clarification as to the <br />difference between R-3 zoning and R -2A, and this was <br />provided by Ms. Johnson. Mrs. Klauka emphasized that she <br />and her husband do not wish to have condos adjoining them; <br />they prefer single family, and a home does not have four or <br />five families in it. <br />Commissioner Fletcher announced that he wished to make <br />comment on the proposed rezoning, speaking as a private <br />citizen and adjacent property owner, and he has discussed <br />this with the County Attorney, who has advised that he <br />should file a memo of voting conflict, which he believed <br />would allow him to make comment and also to vote. <br />Considerable discussion ensued on Board policy whereby <br />any member declaring a conflict of interest leaves the <br />Commission chambers during discussion of that particular <br />item. <br />Commissioner Fletcher stated that, in his view, he does <br />not -stand to profit from the proposed rezoning. <br />Attorney Brandenburg informed the Board that there is a <br />question as to whether the wording in the Statutes ("enures <br />to his special, private gain") specifically means a monetary <br />gain or whether it can relate to something aesthetic. He, <br />therefore, advised Mr. Fletcher to file a memo of voting <br />conflict. As to former Board policy, he stated that any <br />policy of that nature would have to be agreed to by each <br />member of the Commission, and if one member does not agree, <br />he cannot be deprived of his Constitutional right to vote. <br />Commissioner Fletcher filed the following statement for <br />the record and took the floor to make his presentation: <br />91 <br />DEC 15 1982 Sao �C 416 <br />