12/15/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DEC 1 1992 BOK 52 F,�6F ?5 Mr. King stated that basically staff is recommending that a change be made to the current subdivision regulations to conform to the definition in F. S. Chapter 163.170, which states that in platted areas where the minimum lot size is more than 5 acres, it would not be deemed a subdivision and, therefore, would not necessarily have to comply with,the specific minimum design standards of the subdivision regulation. 4, Attorney Brandenburg hoped that if the Boar did wish to move in this direction, they would give him ome guide- lines as to what they would like to see in th ordinance. Commissioner Fletcher stated that he ba ically liked the concept, but felt there should be deed restrictions or covenants that would run with the land tolprevent a future buyer from subdividing and developing that acreage. - Dan Richardson, the applicant requesting the proposed amendment, believed that the present Agricultural zoning would take care of that. He urged that the Board consider the proposed amendment favorably, which he believed would be beneficial in promoting low density. Mr. Richardson noted that he is not necessarily selling this property all rn�5-; acre parcels, some will be considerably larger, and if he is not allowed to sell these parcels without having to pave the roads, etc., it puts.him in a very difficult position. Discussion continued regarding the need for deed restrictions, and Engineer James Beindorf emphasized the reason they wanted to leave this zoned agricultural was because this will only allow building one single family house on a five acre lot without having to come back to the Board. It was pointed out that it would be preferable to keep this from coming back to the Board, if possible. Mr. Richardson commented that this is a new thought to him, but 105