12/15/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DEC 1.5 1982 SOK,. 2 F�Uc g9 The proposed rezoning to R-1, Single Family (tnaximum 6.2 units/ acre) will bring the zonin- district into conformance with the existing; land use and the C.ouiprehensive Plan. REMZIENDATION : Based on the foregoing discussion, staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning to F:-1, Single Family Residential. Planner Johnson informed the Board that this subdivision was in existence before U. S. I was built, which accounts for the triangular shape of some of the lots. She did not believe the owner of the 10 lot triangular parcel fronting on U. S. I, has any use for commercial at the present time and noted that he could have it rezoned to commercial in the future if he so desired. The Chairman asked if anyone present wished to be heard. Dan Richey came before the Board representing his father-in-law, Victor Knight, sole owner of the triangular piece of commercial, (Lots 11 through 20). Mr. Richey was of the opinion that the Planning & Zoning Commission did not realize this parcel was under sole ownership when they recommended the rezoning to R-1 and felt this should be further studied. He agreed there are some existing -n- - structures in the subdivision that should be protected, but felt the undeveloped triangular parcel is suitable for warehouses and other commercial development such as that located across the highway. Ernest Barnwell, owner of Lots 3 and 4 in Pinson Subdivision, informed the Board that he does not want commercial. Alfred Evans, 43rd St., stated that he is the owner of Lots 45 and 46, which are right on U. S. I. Lot 46, on which he lives, is included in the rezoning but Lot 45 is not, and if the proposed rezoning goes through, he will be stuck with two 50, lots, one of which will be commercial and the other residential. Mr. Evans suggested that all the 74