My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-019
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2010's
>
2013
>
2013-019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2019 12:42:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 9:34:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2013-019
Adopted Date
11/19/2013
Agenda Item Number
10.A.1.
Ordinance Type
Capital Improvements Element
Entity Name
CIP
Subject
Capital Improvements Program 5 Year Update
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
12617
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element <br />The physical environment classification encompasses the county's water and waste water utilities, the <br />Solid Waste Disposal District (SWDD), the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the <br />Environmentally Sensitive Land Acquisition Fund. Table 6.5 shows that $47,143,211 was spent on <br />these activities in FY 2011/12. Between fiscal years 2010/11 and 2011/12, physical environment <br />expenditures increased by 2.97%. Since FY2006/07, physical environment expenditures have <br />decreased by 43.13%. Physical environment services represented 21.92% of all county expenses in <br />FY 2011/12. <br />Transportation <br />Departments under the transportation category include Road and Bridge, County Engineering, <br />Secondary Roads Construction, and Traffic Engineering. Those departments are responsible for <br />designing, constructing, overseeing, and maintaining the county's roads and drainage systems. As <br />shown in table 6.5, the county spent $32,734,532 on transportation facilities in FY 2011/12. Since FY <br />2006/07, transportation expenditures have decreased by 40.53%. Transportation expenses represented <br />15.22% of all county expenses in FY 2011/12. <br />Economic Environment <br />Included in the economic environment category are the costs ofproviding services which develop and <br />Figure 6.17: General Government Expenditures by Function <br />2007 25.0% <br />22.1% <br />16.6% <br />19.0% <br />0.3% <br />2.4% 2.09.4 <br />4.2% <br />10 <br />.2% <br />3.7% 14.2% <br />2.8%-40.2% V.R% <br />® General Government <br />m Transportation <br />o Culture/Recreation <br />2009 <br />2008 <br />28.8% 17.8% <br />1.5% <br />10.E% 24.6% <br />3.4%9 10.2% 4.2% <br />22% <br />8.2Uo 3.6 3.3% 2.6% 2.3 8.0% <br />2012 <br />32.2% <br />10.2%b 21.9% <br />4.94 15.2% <br />2.7% 8.7% <br />3.203% 0 9% <br />■ Public Satety <br />■ Economic Environment <br />n Court Related <br />2011 <br />23.8% <br />10.0% 21 ;% <br />3.2% <br />2.8% <br />8.6. 3.6% 0� 15.2% <br />❑ Physical Environment <br />■ Human Services <br />B Debt Service <br />Adopted , 2013, Ordinance 2013- <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.