My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/19/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
1/19/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/19/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F'JAN 19 193 <br />BID # 152 - Road Grader <br />BOOK 029.(A. -UP, 1 <br />The Board reviewed the following memo from the Public Works <br />Director: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: January 10, 1983 FILE: s <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Through: Michael Wright, County Administrator <br />SUBJECT: Award of Bid - IRC #152 - <br />Road and Bridge Dept. Road CLader <br />FROM: Jim Davis, NVI REFERENCES: <br />Public Works Director <br />DESCRIPTION AND cODIDITIONS <br />During the 1982/83 Board of county C ffudssioner's Budget Hearings, the Board appsnved <br />$103,000 for the purchase of a Road Grader. Specifications for the purchase of the <br />equipment were prepared by the Road and Bridge Superintendent aLd Vehicle Maintenance <br />Director. Bids were publicly adverUsed November 20-26, 1982% and bids were opened <br />and recorded on December21,-1982, at a public meeting held in the County Admini •i-rator <br />office. The grader is to be used as a "finish" grader for road paving to replacs Grader.' <br />#48 (1963 Caterpillar), which is to be used as a speare. <br />ALTERNATIV'Eg mism ANALYSIS <br />Ten bidders respondedto the call for bids. Five -responded with a no bid. Of the five <br />bidders submitting prices, four bidders met all minim= specifidations. The ti ee low <br />bids that substantially met specifications were as follows: <br />1) Florida -Georgia Tractor - Galion Model A500 $65,839J.1 <br />2) 2K911y factor -, Caterpillar Model 120G $69,5ia. my <br />3) Tinder -• Tndustrial Machinery Co. CIu mion D710A $70,536.00 <br />Bids received during this bidding period were substantially below these received 3ast <br />year. 7he Cat grader bid price is $42,927. below last year's bid of $112,498, alis, even <br />below the 1980 bid price. It appears that the .recent re�ssiml has placed us ij, <br />'buyer's market". <br />The CaLatp . lax. Grader bid rLeets or exceeds all Spec-:.Lf_i_ca• i( -)ms. The ,t :Lion Gra,4 meet: <br />all specifications except that the windshield does not open. BE.,sed Qn i ne teb1rjj.t:al <br />specifications -listed on the manufacturer's brodwre, the Caterpillax (-wader ,iF e. heavie.•+ <br />more substantial grader. The advantages to purchase the Caterpillar -Grader fur L-.1 <br />additional cost of $3,731.83 is as follows: <br />1) The County has a spare parts stock since we currently have _5 C,) t erpjLLa, _ � grader: <br />2) The County mechanics are experienced in working on Caterpillar graders. The <br />Ccrrity does own a Galion grader and has no spare parts stock. <br />3) The County operators and all local grader csgmers contacted are of the o�,ir,ion <br />that the Caterpillar is a superior grader, with a higher resale/salvage value. <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.