My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/2/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
2/2/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:00 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:50:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/02/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Fletcher, <br />the Board unanimously approved payment <br />to Hamilton, James, Merkle and Young <br />in the amount of $13,413.52. <br />PUBLIC WORKS <br />Traffic Signal Jurisdiction and Maintenance Policy <br />The Board reviewed the following memo and policy draft: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of the DATE: January 19, 1983 F,4: <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Through: Michael Wright, County Administrator 4�(�, . <br />James W. Davis, Public Works Dir `/i <br />SUBJECT: Traffic Signal Jurisdiction and <br />Maintenance Policy <br />FROM: Michael L. Orr; �' \ REFERENCES: <br />Traffic Engi neer <br />r �- N- • it •• itMVLO& <br />The Public Works Division staff has submitted a proposal for a Countywide jurisdiction <br />and maintenance policy for traffic signals to the Transportation Planning Committee for <br />discussion and recommendation.. The Cmnnittee unanimously approved the concept of a <br />unified jurisdiction and maintenance policy for traffic signals during the January ll, <br />1983 meeting <br />At the present time, no formal policy exists concerning governmental responsibility for <br />the installation of new traffic signals at intersections of roads with different m- <br />tenance responsibilities, such as the intersection of County and municipal roads. in <br />addition, maintenance of existing traffic signals does not follow a logical assignment <br />of responsibility, i.e. municipalities maintaining traffic signals on County roads, and <br />visa versa. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />No consistent policy prevails between governmental jurisdictions within the State of <br />Florida. Agreements are left to local discretion. <br />A. Installation and maintenance of traffic signals shall be the responsibility of the <br />Political subdivision whose roadway has the higher functional classification as <br />shaven on the I.R.C. Thoroughfare Plan. Where equal classifications exist, installa- <br />tion/maintenance shall be determined by the roadway with the higher traffic volume, <br />determined on an annual basis and subject to assignment at the start of the fiscal <br />year - <br />16 <br />FUE ` 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.