4/6/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AP $ 1983 53 "E ?'.9 owners could build up to 8 units would be that the County Commission make a determination that they have -Vested rights. Chairman Bird believed that originally the proposal was to put 8 units on one septic tank and then it was,changed to put four on each septic tank. Mr. Zorc noted that two wells is the point that the County got concerned about. He then reviewed the history of the problems they encountered with sewer and water, noting that after the Health Department had said they could have two wells and use City/County sewer, the County came up with a Resolution which said no private well shall serve any more than 4 units on one lot. Mr. Zorc noted that there are several owners involved and he believed they have extended themselves to meet the regulations which have changed from year to year, and they now would like to have this clarified. One of the owners, Mr. St. Pierre, is present, and he was confronted with doubt*by the Planning Department as to whether he could put 8 units on his lot even though all impact fees had been paid and physical installation of lines for those numbers completed. Everything paid was on the basis of 8.units per lot. Discussion ensued regarding various alternatives, and Mr. Zorc continued to emphasize that they have a vested right because of the water systems. He believed if it weren't for the fact that they were stopped in their tracks twice where they had to change and go to a sewer system and also had a problem with the water system, these units probably would have been built before the Master Plan came into being., They now wish to complete the lots to the same configuration as the others already there, which was what this always was designed for. Discussion arose reqarding the fact that impact fees for water service were fully paid, and Mr. Zorc pointed out 92