Laserfiche WebLink
W <br />� � r <br />stages. He felt if it was the desire of the people, we <br />could delete the portion between 15th Ave. and 16th Ave. and <br />authorize the resolution for paving of lst Place between <br />16th Ave. and 20th Ave.; however, the County has a valid <br />petition with 780 of the property owners consenting. <br />Mrs. Margaret Sesan, 1505 lst Place, addressed the <br />Board and explained the location of her lot,.which is right <br />across from Mr. Muzeck's property facing lst Place and was <br />the only house on the block. She did not understand why Mr. <br />Muzeck stated his house is on 15th Ave., when the house <br />faces lst Place. She always understood that whoever owns a <br />corner lot, determines when they build which side is to be <br />the front. <br />Debate followed between Mrs. Sesan and Mr. Muzeck. <br />Mrs. Sesan felt the paving will enhance her property and <br />that of Mr. Muzeck's. She noted that if the paving is not <br />done at this time, the cost will be even greater. She <br />stated that she is tired of eating dust and wants very much <br />to have the street paved. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if an original petition was <br />circulated to pave a street from points A to B and later <br />extended to point C, whether it is legal for the Commission <br />to address this. Attorney Brandenburg advised that it was. <br />Commissioner Scurlock said that when a petition was <br />being circulated and people who lived on the street and had <br />been eating dust had made it their business to sign the <br />petition, he did not feel it was fair to deny the paving <br />just because everyone had not been contacted, especially <br />with the difficulty in contacting so many out-of-state <br />property owners. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that procedures were properly <br />followed. <br />53 <br />MAY 41983 aoa . 53 3,89 <br />