Laserfiche WebLink
In summary, the Growth Management Plan sets forth policies which will have <br />a significant effect on development in Vero Beach and the barrier island <br />as a whole. Because of such a wide ranging impact, the policies should <br />not be adopted while there is a question concerning their impacts on each <br />of the jurisdictions involved. While the Planning staff supports environ- <br />mental preservation, low density and growth management, it is impossible <br />to supporf the Committee's policies concerning these issues without know- <br />ing the full impact of same. <br />Of course, considerations should not be limited to the above as a review <br />by Council may reveal additional concerns. <br />The Resource Planning and Management Committee will meet at 9:00 a.m. on <br />June 2, 1983, in Ft. Pierce at Indian River Community College to vote on <br />the policies attached; and unless advised to the contrary, as a_member we <br />will register opposition to these policies for the foregoing reasons. <br />DR/WRY/nc <br />atts <br />XC: David S. Croom, Chairman <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />Gary Anent, County Development Coordinator for St. <br />Lucie County, distributed to the Board the following <br />memorandum and letter to the Chairman of the Hutchinson <br />Island Resource Management Committee asking for a <br />postponement of consideration of the sub -committee report <br />until November 3, 1983. <br />TO: County Administrator <br />County Commission <br />FROM: County Development Coordinator <br />County Planner <br />County Attorney <br />DATE: May 10, 1983 <br />SUBJECT: Hutchinson Island Resource Management <br />Committee -Subcommittee Report <br />On June 2, 1983, the Hutchinson Island Resource Management <br />Committee will hold the second reading of the attached <br />subcommittee report. At that time, the amendment process will <br />begin. <br />Based on discussions held by the subcommittee, and the <br />attached copy of the report, the Development Coordinator's Office <br />and the County Attorney's Office share the following concerns: <br />1. The subcommittee has refused to <br />acknowledge that individual property <br />rights are an issue. No discussion has <br />been held concerning local government <br />implementation of the recommended <br />policies. Of all the recommended <br />policies, the policy on density transfer <br />(page 19) is perhaps the most disturbing <br />as it eliminates all density credits in <br />environmentally sensitive areas, which <br />are not defined. Denial of all use of an <br />individual's property, as you are aware, <br />has serious legal implications. Past <br />15 <br />Q�J( ce3 PAGE <br />