Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />JUN a 1983 .5.� <br />Commissioner Lyons commented that nothing adjoins <br />Golden Sands, and he, therefore, would go along with the <br />idea of acquiring property you might be able to add to, such <br />as Erdo and Bell Road. <br />Commissioner Bowman noted that on Golden Sands we would <br />be picking up an option to purchase almost ten acres west of <br />A14, plus a four acre donation. While the Erdo tract offers <br />the same opportunity, it is $50.00 more a front foot, but <br />they will pay for the documentary stamps and title insurance <br />while Golden Sands will only pay half of those.costs. Com- <br />missioner Bowman, however, liked the idea of being able in <br />the future to add to what we acquire now. <br />Commissioner Wodtke argued in favor of using our money <br />to acquire the Golden Sands parcel because of its being <br />located closer to Wabasso Beach Park and then let the state <br />pick up the others which are contiguous. He liked our <br />options on the Erdo parcel and Golden Sands. <br />Al MacAdam, member of the Beach Acquisition Committee, <br />informed the Board that he and the members of the committee <br />lean strongly towards the Golden Sands parcel because of its <br />location. If our growth continues at the present rate, it <br />would seem the closer we can get a park to the AlA/510 <br />intersection and have more ample land for parking, the <br />better off we would be. <br />Attorney Brandenburg asked Appraiser Armfield to <br />explain the difference in value he attributed to the Erdo <br />and Golden Sands acreage lying west of SR A1A.. <br />Mr. Armfield explained that was purely on an opinion <br />basis, and it related to the fact that the Land Use Plan <br />designation for the property closer to Summerplace is LD -2 <br />while the Erdo acreage is LD -1. If the Land Use Plan had <br />contained the same designation for both, he would not have <br />differentiated between them. <br />12 <br />