Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />JUL 18 1983 <br />54' <br />Chairman Bird felt the Motion sets the basic tone for <br />what we are trying to accomplish and believed we then should <br />go through the revised plan and address specific items. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />Items set out in the Policy Analysis were then <br />addressed, as follows: <br />No. 1 - (Page 11, Line 10 of revised Hutchinson Island Plan) <br />Mr. King informed the Board that our Plan states very <br />much the same, but it does not spell out the three <br />exceptions, listed as (a), (b) and (c). <br />It was generally agreed that the criteria set out in <br />(a), (b), and (c) is more restrictive than our current plan <br />in that it pretty well prohibits the property owner from <br />using his land unless he makes it available to the public or <br />some governmental agency. <br />Attorney Brandenburg brought up the legal point that if <br />you are going to require an individual to give you a public <br />benefit in order to allow him to develop, this could be <br />considered to constitute a "taking." <br />Various alternatives were discussed, but Commissioner <br />Lyons stressed that we do not have these limitations in our <br />Plan, and he is not going to sit here and change the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />ON MOTION MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously <br />agreed to leave out the limitations (a), (b), <br />and (c) and substitute the pertinent language <br />employed in our current Comprehensive Plan. <br />10 <br />