Laserfiche WebLink
Nos. 18 - 23 re prohibition of aerobic wastewater treatment <br />plants, monitoring frequency, surge tanks, etc'. Commissioner <br />Scurlock believed that Nos. 18 - 21 will be dealt with under <br />our new franchise programs and did not feel Nos. 22 and 23 <br />need to be addressed in this plan. <br />It was agreed that Nos. 18 - 23 should be eliminated. <br />No. 24 & 25 (Page 21, Line 14 and Page 22, Line 4) <br />These deal with each local government developing a <br />capital improvement program for its portion of the barrier <br />island to integrate with the overall management plan. Mr. <br />King explained that each jurisdiction is supposed to look at <br />anticipated expenditures for the next six years and revenue <br />sources and balance them out and set priorities. <br />Chairman Bird noted that we don't address this in our <br />Comprehensive Plan ,although we probably should have. He <br />noted if we put it in, we will be inconsistent with our <br />Plan. <br />Mr. King pointed out that this actually is mandated by <br />law and it is in our Plan in some areas. <br />The Chairman directed that Nos. 24 and 25 be left in <br />the document to be submitted to the Hutchinson Island <br />Committee. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the transmittal method, and <br />Mr. King explained that he has developed amendment sheets on <br />everything.that was proposed by the Ad Hoc Committee, and <br />now what he will have to do is go back through and amend the <br />document submitted by them to be consistent with what was <br />decided on today. As to how the Hutchinson Island Committee <br />will address this, Mr. King believed they will go through <br />the document line by line, page by page, and vote on each <br />change. <br />Administrator Wright asked what the Board wishes staff <br />to do in the event the Hutchinson Island Committee's proposal <br />does not agree with ours and is more restrictive. <br />15 <br />J U L 1 1983 �'BoOK 54 FAGS U <br />