Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 31983 <br />B . COX 4 phu,241 <br />future purchased property would be forever devoted directly <br />to purposes in the North\County area. <br />Mr. Van.DeVoorde explained that they did not not want to <br />be in a position that after purchasing equipment to have to <br />move it down into some other part of the county. He felt <br />that as long as they have an agreement, they want to be able <br />to designate where the equipment is to be used. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the reason the <br />County suggested that Item 6 on Page 2 remain the same was <br />to avoid any future dispute on who owns the property and to <br />clear up any question as to the County's ability to assign <br />recreation assets, if deemed necessary. <br />Commissioner Bowman asked when the inventory is done <br />and Mr. VanbeVoorde advised it is done annually in the <br />summertime during a break in their programs. <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt that the County should have <br />the ability to utilize the equipment if we budget money for <br />-the North County, and did not know if the Board could <br />stipulate that the property is to remain in one particular <br />area. <br />Chairman Bird felt that we should start out with a <br />beginning inventory and Attorney Brandenburg stated that was <br />the way this agreement read, that the County gets together <br />with the Corporation and they go through all the assets, and <br />determine what was purchased with County funds and moved <br />forward from there. <br />Chairman Bird pointed out that the major question still <br />to be decided was whether capital improvements have to <br />remain in the North County, or whether they are free to <br />roam. <br />Community services Director Thomas understood that <br />under this agreement, the Corporation would have control of <br />the assets unless the agreement is terminated and then the <br />County would have control. <br />56 <br />