Laserfiche WebLink
4. That the District Plan contain a contingency for services to <br />chronic patients in the four county area should the legislature <br />withdraw its appropriation of "D" funds currently targeted for <br />the four county area. <br />5. That the District Plan specifically recognize the core service <br />agency as the ideal organizational arrangement for assuring the <br />integration of services in the four county area along with the <br />requirement that the District Board follow the core service agency <br />policy in the four county area which has been in effect for. <br />several years as presented in Appendix F. (Issue #7 in Center <br />Board's position„statement.) <br />6. That the District Board be specifically prohibited from encumbering <br />any of -the four county local matching funds for any purpose whatso— <br />ever. (Issue #6 in Center Board's position statement.) <br />Part Three: Suggestions for Other Specific Four County <br />Commissions' Recommendations for District Plan <br />Amendments <br />Part Two of this paper addresses those issues which the four counties <br />can require be contained the District Plan. This Part addresses those <br />issues which are of a more generic nature. We suggest that the Four County <br />Commissions strongly recommend the following modif ications.in the District <br />Plan: <br />1. That an allocation methodology be included in the District Plan. <br />(Issue #1 in the Center Board's position statement.) <br />2. That service goals be ranked, correspond to the unmet needs in <br />the four county area and funded accordingly. (Issue #2 in the <br />Center Board's position statement.) <br />3. That funds be shifted within the District as indicated by an <br />allocation methodology based on prioritization of needs. (Issue <br />#3 in the Center Board's position statement.) <br />4. That the gross services needs of the four county area be <br />addressed before any new projects are funded in Palm Beach County. <br />(Issue #4 in the Center Board's position statement.) <br />5. That F.S. 394.76 be followed with regard to County Commission <br />matching funds. (Issue #5 in the Center Board's position statement.) <br />6 That treatment services are the highest priority for all disability <br />groups and therefore, must be funded. (Issue #10 in the Center <br />Baord's position statement.) <br />66 <br />UG- 3 19'��Q FACF .5. <br />