My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/21/1983 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
9/21/1983 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:34:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M r M <br />the budget to see if -there was any possible way any <br />additional cuts could be made. <br />Administrator Wright confirmed that staff went back and <br />looked at the, proposed budget very hard, taking into <br />consideration what was considered to be a very important <br />need and that is the morale of our general employees. The <br />Administrator pointed out that through the whole budget <br />process, no formal consideration -has been given to any type <br />salary increase although there has been some increase in <br />life insurance. He; therefore, asked that the Commis- <br />sioners give consideration to adding a 2h% pool of money to <br />the payrolls of all agencies funded out of the taxing units, <br />the Constitutional Officers as well, and wished to request <br />that this be applied on a merit basis for those employees <br />directly under his responsibility since he felt it is <br />extremely important to reward those who do a good job. <br />Administrator Wright felt that by making use of the <br />additional $400,000 taxing ability that has come to light, <br />it is possible to fund a 2h% pay raise and, by tightening <br />our belts, still carry the county next year in pretty good <br />shape. He suggested reducing the published amount in the <br />two major funds, the General Fund and the MSTU, by another <br />$115,000, which would put our expenditures in the major <br />funds approximately $43,000 below last year. <br />In the ensuing discussion about basing this on the <br />merit system, it was noted that the Administrator can <br />control this only in his own bailiwick. <br />Chairman Bird asked, in the event the Board should feel <br />that 2% rather 22% was the maximum we could go with, whether <br />it would be staff's recommendation to take the extra -1/2% <br />and beef up contingencies. <br />OMB Director Barton informed the Board that the 1/2% <br />would amount to about $20,000 for the General Fund and <br />Book <br />SEP 21198 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.