My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/5/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
10/5/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:36:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/05/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 5 1983. rAf 89 <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 9/26/83: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of DATE: September 26, 1983 FILE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners <br />THROUGH: Terrance G. Pinto 'COIL, <br />Utility Services DirecSULQr <br />' <br />BJECT'GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES <br />AMENDMENTS TO FRANCHISE <br />FROM: Joyce S. Hamilton REFERENCES: 1) Water Agreement <br />Administrative Aid 2) Location Map <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS: <br />General Development Utilities, Inc., has proposed certain amend- <br />ments to their water and sewer franchise. The Utility desires to <br />clarify the procedures for the processing of general rate increase <br />applications and to simplify the procedures for the "pass-through" <br />to its customers of rate charges imposed on it by the County under <br />an agreement to purchase wholesale water utility service from the <br />County. The Utility also desires to revise its franchised territory. <br />Consistent with current policy, the County desires to impose a <br />franchise fee on the provision of water and sewer services by the <br />Utility. The County also desires to reserve the right to adopt, <br />in addition to the provisions herein contained and existing appli- <br />cable resolutions or laws, such fees and charges as it shall find <br />necessary in the exercise of the police power and lawful authority <br />vested in said County. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSES: <br />Amending this franchise agreement would allow for the collection <br />of franchise fees to the County which was not part of the original <br />agreement and we have limited their franchise area to what we <br />think is more suitable for them to serve. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends the Board amend the original Resolution dated <br />April 5, 1960 subsequently amended by Resolution 77-95, Resolution <br />80-15 and Resolution 81-101. <br />54 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.