My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/12/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
10/12/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/12/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 12 1993 55, 34 <br />Mr. Solin gave his address as 2206 llth Lane, Vero <br />Beach. He stated that he was the principal of Solin & <br />Associates, Inc., and he introduced his associate, Tom Poupard. <br />Mr. Solin briefly described the location of property and the <br />proposed project which is the development of an executive golf <br />course and 600 condominium units. <br />Attorney Brown addressed the Commission, explaining <br />that the golf course will encompass 80-90 acres of the project. <br />He asked the Commission to decide whether or not it was good <br />planning to put in 3 units/acre of single-family homes with <br />wells and septic tanks on 150 acres; or whether it would be <br />bet -ter to put in 3-4 units/acre of cluster type housing with a <br />golf course in the same area. <br />Mr. Sheerer stated that the Planning Department had <br />talked with Mr. Cole's agents on two occasions. He said that <br />the staff felt that this property was not contiguous to any <br />urban development of the intensity which is allowed in LD -2 <br />areas. He pointed out that the applicant feels that allowing 4 <br />units/acre on this site would provide a buffer -between the <br />maximum of 6 units/acre allowed east of his property and 3 <br />units/acre allowed west of his property. Mr'. Shearer noted that <br />this buffer could be established on the east side of Kings <br />Highway without amending the Land Use Element of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Mr. Shearer stated that, based on the fact that the <br />staff did not feel that this property was contiguous to existing <br />urban development, that Kings Highway is a good boundary between <br />LD -1 and LD -2, and that a buffer between 6 units/acre east of <br />this site and 3 units/acre west of the site could be provided on <br />the east side of Kings Highway, the staff recommends denial of <br />the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, as well as denial of <br />the rezoning request. <br />Mr. Keating stated that neither criteria that has been <br />established by the staff. to review proposed amendments has been <br />34 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.