My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/9/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
11/9/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/09/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r N OV 9 1983 - <br />that is providing service, but there is nothing included <br />that relates to a replacement fund per se. <br />Chairman Bird announced that Mr. Alexander from the <br />Department of Environmental Regulation in Orlando has made <br />himself available this evening if the Commissioners have any <br />questions. <br />Mr. Alexander introduced Mr. Bostwick, District - <br />Engineer for DER. <br />Court Reporter Zambataro swore in Mr. Bostwick, who <br />stated that his name is William M. Bostwick, Jr., business <br />address 3319 Maguire Blvd., Orlando, Fla., and he is a <br />professional engineer with the DER. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if this plant has been <br />under citation since 1978, and Mr. Bostwick stated that he <br />has not researched back to 1978, but presently the system is <br />operating within their regulations. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that, therefore, it would <br />appear there would be no need to make any changes to the <br />existing plant other than for expansion. <br />Mr. Bostwick believed there is some bacteriological <br />problem with one of the water supply production wells and <br />there probably will be a need for some additional chlorina- <br />tion at the well site. <br />Utilities Director Pinto informed the Board that a <br />report from our inspector shows that two of the wells may be <br />within 100' of a septic system. He wished to know what the <br />company will have to do if that proves to be true. <br />Mr. Bostwick confirmed that one well.is within the 100' <br />radius, and it was approved a number of years ago. He was <br />not aware of any bacteriological problem there. The second <br />well has shown some problems, and Mr. Bostwick believed <br />there will be some further investigation and possibly some <br />remedial measure may be needed or even replacement with <br />another source of supply, if necessary. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.