My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/9/1983
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1983
>
11/9/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:02 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/09/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N OV 9 1983 accU5 ?A <br />X27 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously agreed <br />that the impact fee be elevated to 75% - that an <br />increase of 40% to the existing rate payer be <br />effective immediately - that any additional rate <br />increase would be contingent upon GDU solving any <br />potential water quality problems as well as any <br />distribution problems, such as pressure, etc. - <br />and that, as set out in the franchise agreement, <br />GDU has the option to petition the Commission at <br />any time for an additional rate increase. <br />Attorney Roen asked for clarification as to when the <br />authorized rate increase will go into effect? <br />In the ensuing discussion, it was stated that it would <br />be effective in the next billing cycle, but Commissioner <br />Wodtke raised the question as to whether the entire system <br />is billed at one time or done alphabetically at staggered <br />intervals. <br />time. <br />Mr. Fancher felt all customers were billed at the same <br />Utilities Director Pinto then wished to know if we are <br />saying the next bill that is issued is going to show the <br />increase. He pointed out that this could involve <br />retroactive charges. <br />After further discussion, it was agreed that there will <br />be a bill issued at the existing rates, and the next <br />successive bill would show the -increase, <br />Mr. Pinto then wished to know how we are going to <br />construct the 40% increase in relation to the facility <br />charge and the user charge, and Administrator Wright <br />commented that GDU has asked for a change in rate structure <br />and did we give them one or did we say keep the same <br />structure, but you have 40% more? <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.