Laserfiche WebLink
Administrator Wright noted that this matter had been <br />tabled from an earlier meeting and explained that when the <br />road was originally asphalted, it was put in too thin, and <br />when the contractor came back, he put the asphalt down too <br />thick. Rather than passing along the entire cost of the <br />too -thick asphalt, Public Works Direotor Jim Davis has <br />negotiated to split the difference. <br />Attorney Brandenburg advised that the only alternative <br />to holding a public hearing to'adopt an amended final <br />assessment roll for recertification to the Tax Collector, <br />would be to absorb the cost from the overall road fund. <br />Chairman Scurlock tended to support the concept of <br />absorbing the cost in that he believed increasing the <br />assessment would have a negative impact on the petition <br />paving program and people might question further <br />assessments. <br />Director Davis stated this cost is.still under the <br />preliminary assessment by as much as $1.00 a front foot on <br />one project and as much as $1.25 on the other project. <br />Chairman Scurlock stated that the bottom line is that <br />the people will be paying substantially less than what they <br />were told during the public hearing- <br />ON-MOTION <br />earing. <br />ONMOTION by Commissioner Bird, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowman, the <br />Board unanimously authorized staff to set up <br />a public hearing on this matter. <br />ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 82-118, CONCEALED <br />WEAPONS PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FEE <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that a resolution is <br />needed to amend Resolution.82-118, which would provide for <br />an increase in the renewal application fee from $20.00 to <br />$23.00. <br />w <br />.' RNK 55` FAu-75 <br />