My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/29/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
3/29/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:23 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/29/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pinkerton explained that what he is presenting <br />today is not the final design, but it is a new concept which <br />he hopes will be favorably received. It is basically the <br />same octagonal pod that we had before, but drastically <br />simplified. The Jail Committee and the Commissioners <br />gathered around the model of the new design, while Mr. <br />Pinkerton explained the functions in the support building, <br />cell -block and connecting corridor. The cell block can <br />have 46 rooms upstairs and 40 rooms downstairs and all rooms <br />would be sized to accommodate two inmates so that the Jail <br />Administrator and the Sheriff would have total discretion as <br />to when and where to double the occupancy of those rooms. <br />Thirty of these rooms must be maintained as single cells at <br />all times, but the balance could be doubled, which results <br />in a highly flexible building. <br />Commissioner Bird asked what happens when the County <br />needs more jail cells, and Mr. Pinkerton explained that <br />another cell block (housing pod) could be added. <br />Mr. Pinkerton expressed his appreciation to the Board <br />and the Jail Committee for having pushed him toward working <br />out this new design, which he feels is a substantially <br />better plan than anyone else can offer. He advised that <br />they could have detailed schematics to present to the Board <br />in about two weeks. <br />It was the feeling of the Jail Committee that they <br />would like to see the full schematic on this new concept in <br />two weeks as long as it wasn't costing the County any more <br />money. <br />Chairman Scurlock wanted to be assured that we are <br />clean with PDR and suggested that staff be authorized to <br />work with the architect in regard to what is owed, etc. <br />Administrator Wright wanted time to work out the <br />details and bring it back to the Board in a package at the <br />7 <br />MAR 2 9 1984 <br />56 RAu 50, 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.