My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/4/1984
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1984
>
4/4/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:50:24 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:39:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/04/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />APR <br />4 <br />1994 <br />Boa <br />56 <br />FACE6 <br />that puts the <br />consent over the the requirement of 50% <br />of <br />property owners needed to get the referendum. He urged the <br />Board to reconsider action taken at the meeting of 2/29/84 <br />when he was not present where the Interlocal Agreement with <br />the City of Vero Beach was approved, which stated that in <br />the event of annexation of South Beach, the City would allow <br />the County to develop Round Island Park in its own manner, <br />and in return for that, the County would send in a <br />referendum consent card on the 90 acres of park property <br />owned by the County. He believed that the public feels that <br />the County by signing the consent form is to a certain <br />extent agreeing with the annexation. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained the rationale for <br />signing the Interlocal Agreement and agreeing to the <br />consent for a referendum was that the County recognized the <br />City may have the capability of annexing Round Island Park <br />whether we consent or not, and it was hoped this action <br />would protect the County's rights to developing the park. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that there was another reason <br />why the County had sent the consent card in and that was to <br />show a certain amount of neutrality in the annexation issue. <br />The Commission wanted the people to have the opportunity to <br />decide. <br />Attorney Brandenburg explained that the only way the <br />County can rescind the consent for a referendum is to breach <br />the Interlocal Agreement and he did not recommend that. He <br />asked if the Commission would like to adopt a resolution at <br />the next meeting, which would give certain assurances to <br />South Beach property owners that the Commission intends to <br />fully represent them in all matters in the future, and if <br />they are not annexed, the County Commission intends to go <br />ahead and provide them with water and sewer services to the <br />z best extent possible, etc. He further noted that a <br />resolution could be adopted requesting the City of Vero <br />70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.