4/4/1984 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_x APR 41984' BOOK 56 "PAGE 6.33 The Administrator assured her that she did not have to pay for that, and Attorney Brandenburg stated that what Ms. Bridwell is responsible for is moving her fence from where it shouldn't have been in the first place. Thomas Imperato of Tropic Villas North referred to the computer printout that had been handed out and stated that he was confused between the printout and Page 8 of the report which shows that Multi -Family Residential using 20,000 gallons would have a decrease of $24.86. Discussion followed and it was determined that the charges set out on Page 8 for 20,000 gallons under Multi -Family Residential are incorrect; the remaining figures are correct. The rates shown in the printout are correct, and for Tropic Villas Multi -Family using 20,000 gallons, there would be a total increase of $2.14. It was further explained that this increase is for the whole building so that Mr. Imperato's share would only be a fourth, or about 54�. It was also explained to Mr. Imperato that the computer printout he was referring to applied only to his particular group of condominiums. Director Pinto commented that the single family units have a slightly higher increase because they are faced with a meter charge for each unit whereas Mr. Imperato's building has four units on one meter. Mr. Vernon commented that with most utilities you don't have to pay for a general service call unless it results from something that is your fault. Mr. Pinto agreed, and stated that if the call is because of a problem that was caused by the Utility Department and not the customer's fault, they would not be charged for it. Robert Krieger, 2344 1st Pl. S.W., stated that naturally no one likes price increases, but in the last three months he has disconnected his water conditioner and 18