Laserfiche WebLink
City for our consent card back; if the City <br />wishes to continue to honor our agreement <br />separate and apart from the card, that is <br />fine, and if'not, then that is how it will <br />have to be. <br />Commissioner Lyons stated that he would like to have <br />the Motion indicate that in view of the misunderstanding <br />about our action in signing the card to indicate a neutral <br />position, we now find that taking the action of withdrawing <br />the card will be the best way we know of to indicate a <br />neutral position. Commissioner Lyons felt strongly that we <br />should take a neutral position, and after listening to Mr. <br />Hamner, he did feel that the deck is stacked to a certain <br />extent with the way the absentee landowners are represented. <br />Newly elected City Councilman Gary Parris agreed with <br />Councilman Cochrane that if the County pulls back their <br />consent card, they take the agreement back, too. He wished <br />to reassure Mr. White that the City does realize The <br />Moorings has a serious problem. He believed what the County <br />Commission is saying is that City and County must start <br />working hand in hand, and he would like to see them work <br />together to solve the problem. He assured those present <br />that although he may not agree with the way the annexation <br />is being proposed, he is one Councilman who will be looking <br />into their problem. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously <br />Attorney Brandenburg asked if the Board wished to <br />request that the County Park property be eliminated from the <br />annexation area, and the Board indicated they did not. <br />11 <br />APR 10 1984 <br />BOOK 56 PACE 683 <br />