Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Transportation System <br />The subject property has direct access to 143rd Street, 80th <br />Avenue, 142nd Street, and 110th Street (all classified as local <br />streets on the County's Thoroughfare Plan). The development of <br />the subject property for duplexes would generate 49 average <br />annual daily trips (AADT). If the subject property were <br />rezoned to a single-family zoning district, it would generate <br />50 AADT. All of these trips can be expected to use U.S.1 which <br />currently carries 9200 AADT in this area at level -of -service <br />"A" <br />Environment <br />The subject property is not designated as environmentally <br />sensitive nor is it in a flood prone area. <br />Utilities <br />County water and wastewater facilities are not available for <br />this part of the County. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Based on.the above analysis, including the existing land use <br />pattern, the proximity of the subject property to the <br />commercial nodes in this area and the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission's recommendation, staff recommends that the subject <br />property be redesignated from LD -1, Low -Density Residential 1, <br />to LD -2, Low -Density Residential 2. The Planning and Zoning <br />Commission voted to deny the applicant's rezoning request for <br />the reason stated in the description and conditions section of <br />this analysis. However, the staff feels that a rezoning from <br />C-1 to R -2D would be appropriate because it would be a down <br />zoning consistent with the recommended LD -2 land use <br />designation, and would provide for a suitable land use buffer <br />between the commercial and single-family residential uses. <br />Commissioner Lyons wished to know if the Bardelis <br />property is already subdivided into lots. <br />Mr. Shearer reported that it is subdivided into five <br />lots, each of about 10,000 sq. ft. The subdivision itself <br />has lots ranging in size from 10,000 sq. ft. to 3 acres. <br />This is an unusual situation where it was planned as two <br />separate subdivisions, and they were platted one year apart. <br />However, most of the lots fronting on U.S.I. have been <br />developed Commercial while the lots along the river are <br />single family homes, except for doctor's office. The lots <br />in the in-between Blocks B, C, and F, have not developed to <br />a great extent, there being only three homes on those three <br />blocks; so, obviously there has been some problem. Much of <br />the subdivision originally was zoned C-1; part was rezoned <br />19 <br />fl00K 56 PACE .7 <br />APR 111984 <br />