Laserfiche WebLink
F, <br />RECOlv1MENDAT I ON : <br />Based on the above analysis, including the proximity of the <br />subject property to the recently rezoned commercial property, <br />the fact that there is unallocated commercial acreage available <br />in this node, the small size of the subject property, and the <br />Planning and -Coning Commission's recommendation, staff recom- <br />mends this rezoning request be approved. However, staff also <br />recommends that the node not be extended west of the subject <br />property. <br />Michael O'Haire, attorney representing the applicant, <br />noted that staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission have <br />recommended approval of the rezoning. <br />Richard Shearer, Chief, Long Range Planning, presented <br />staff's recommendation to rezone the property of approxi- <br />mately .7 acres and showed a slide of the land use map. <br />Based on the fact that there-i's__.an allocated acreage in that <br />node, staff feels that this property should be rezoned to <br />Commercial 1. He emphasized, however, that staff <br />recommends that this is as far west as this node should go. <br />Vice Chairman Lyons opened the Public Hearing and asked <br />if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. There were <br />none. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board <br />unanimously (3--0) closed the Public Hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wodtke, the Board <br />unanimously (3-0) approved the Austin request as <br />recommended by staff and adopted Ordinance 84-21, <br />rezoning approximately .7 acres from Multiple - <br />Family District to Commercial District. <br />29 <br />